The Dyson Ball Animal 2 can be a high-tech, performance vacuum. It cleans adequately, handles great, and true to the name, does a fantastic job at collecting pet hair. However, it wasn’t the very best overall in the test and neglected to win an award. In addition, additionally it is exceedingly costly – those fancy cyclonic separators and also other top of the line features aren’t cheap.
To actually see which vacuum arrived on top and sucked away all the competition, we bought the top models now available and set them through several side-by-side tests to award the winners. Each product received a general score from -100 depending on its performance within our five rating metrics – Hard Surface Cleaning, Convenience, Handling, Rug Cleaning, and Pet Hair – each weighted proportionately on their importance. These sections provide more detail about how precisely the Dyson Ball Animal 2 performed and why it only merited the runner-up position.
Carpet Cleaners is quite possibly the most important metric of the test, comprising 35% of the total score. This metric consisted of evaluating each vacuum’s ability at collecting oats, flour, cereal, and rice – both on the low-pile flat carpet and medium-pile fluffy carpet. The Dyson Ball did well earning a 7 out from 10, tying for the runner-up position together with the Shark Rotator and also the Miele Compact in this particular metric.
The Dyson did adequately in your rice collection test on low-pile carpet, taking two passes to obtain 99% of your rice along with a final third pass to collect some residual fragments and dust. It performed similarly in the fluffy carpet, nevertheless it only took two passes – no final cleanup pass required!
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 was somewhat of a disappointment in our flour collection test, doing a comprehensive mediocre job. It did average at collecting flour on low and medium-pile carpet, about comparable to the Hoover.
The Animal 2’s performance did improve in our cereal collection test. This model did an exceptional job at collecting Cheerios from flat carpet, practically getting everything on the first pass and getting the remainder having a second. It did a little worse on the fluffy carpet, tending to push the cereal around instead of collect it.
This vacuum finished out this performance having an alright score at collecting oatmeal. It did fine in the flat carpet, though left some crushed up oat dust behind. The same instance happened in the fluffier carpet, with all of the large flakes collected after two passes, but plenty of crumbs and fragments were baked into the carpet that refused to be sucked up – even after 8-10 passes!
Ranking next regarding importance, our Ease of Use rating metric taken into account 25% from the total score. This was made up of evaluating how easy it was to transition between different flooring types, each vacuum’s maximum reach, and its noise levels, along with how closely it could clean close to a position or under furniture. Your Pet 2 scored reasonably well, earning a 6 out from 10 – tying for that runner-up position with the majority of the rest.
Of the many models, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 causes it to be the best to switch between hard and soft flooring. This model automatically adjusts the height, and also through an method to disable the rotating brush.
This model did well in our edging test, just about collecting all the rice – while it was surpassed through the Kenmore.
For that furniture test, the Animal 2 did about average. This model reached 5.5″-6″ under our simulated box sofa – about half as far as the top models, such as the Shark Rotator.
This vacuum might be a in the loud side, especially when it is on carpet, reading 76 dBa on the SPL meter – the next-loudest of your entire group.
Tying for that second highest score from the entire group, the Ball Animal 2 did very well inside our Handling metric. To evaluate this, we rated and compared the pushing and pulling effort, the maneuverability, and also the ease at cleaning your flight of stairs. Altogether, these three tests made up 20% in the total score.
It was actually quite easy to wash your flight of stairs using the Animal 2. This model tied for your longest reach of the entire group together with the Kenmore Elite, in a position to clean 12 stairs before needing to be moved. However, this vacuum is a little about the heavy side, finishing in the center of the pack, as shown with the chart below.
This model did master our maneuverability test, tying for your top score overall. We cleaned around a pair of typical furniture, noting where each vacuum got stuck or missed spots. This is one of the easiest to advance upright vacuum, only matched with the Shark Rotator – some an unfair matchup, because the Rotator has got the lift-away feature to enhance maneuverability.
Finishing out this metric by using a decent score, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 only took moderate to mild effort to push or pull – slightly hampered by its weight.
The Ball Animal 2 did well within the Hard Surface Cleaning group of tests, but not the most effective – once more finishing runner-as much as the Shark Rotator using its score of 7 away from 10. We once again used rice, flour, oats, and cereal as our test messes, conducting all these tests with a part of laminate hardwood floor. This vacuum automatically adjusts the height for hard floors so we turned the brush off for most of these tests.
The Ball Animal 2 did very well within the rice test, getting every one of the debris around the first pass. However, it did not continue this performance with the flour test. The Ball Animal 2 collected all the flour off of the top of the floor, but left a lot of residual debris within the cracks – despite multiple passes.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 resumed its solid performance within our cereal test, collecting all the Cheerios in just one pass. We were somewhat skeptical at first, because the Dysoninitially piled them up as opposed to sucking them up, but shifted part way through and collected every Cheerio. This vacuum finished out our test using a solid score, cleaning the vast majority of oats in just one pass, with only a light cleanup pass required to finish the task.
The very last metric with this test, Pet hair, takes credit to the remaining 10% from the total score. True to the name, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 did exceptionally well with this test, tying for the top score featuring its 9 out of 10. This vacuum collected the 2nd highest volume of hair, only rivaled through the Shark Navigator Deluxe. We tested this by spreading 5 grams of pet hair from a local groomer out on medium-pile carpet, then pressing it in with a floor roller.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 collected 94% of the hair, just lagging the 96% in the Navigator.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 isn’t an excellent value, offering 2nd-tier performance at the premium price.
Stuffed with technology as well as other features, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 is priced as a top notch, premium vacuum. However, it is tough to recommend this model whenever it was outperformed by a substantially more affordable model.
Should you have just about any concerns concerning where by and how you can make use of Dyson vs Shark, you are able to email us with our web page.
Sorry, there was no activity found. Please try a different filter.